<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mayflower R&amp;C Low-Profile Armor Package</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.itstactical.com/2009/11/13/mayflower-rc-low-profile-armor-carrier-and-uw-chest-rig/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.itstactical.com/2009/11/13/mayflower-rc-low-profile-armor-carrier-and-uw-chest-rig/</link>
	<description>Imminent Threat Solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:55:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Black</title>
		<link>http://www.itstactical.com/2009/11/13/mayflower-rc-low-profile-armor-carrier-and-uw-chest-rig/comment-page-1/#comment-27829</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Black</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 18:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itstactical.com/?p=2597#comment-27829</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re welcome Brent! You can&#039;t go wrong with Mayflower! Great Stuff!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome Brent! You can&#8217;t go wrong with Mayflower! Great Stuff!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent M. Piatti</title>
		<link>http://www.itstactical.com/2009/11/13/mayflower-rc-low-profile-armor-carrier-and-uw-chest-rig/comment-page-1/#comment-27825</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent M. Piatti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 18:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itstactical.com/?p=2597#comment-27825</guid>
		<description>I gotta get my hands on one of those!  I just took a look at their website and the cumberbun has the ability to hold side SAPIs as well.  Thanks for the review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotta get my hands on one of those!  I just took a look at their website and the cumberbun has the ability to hold side SAPIs as well.  Thanks for the review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.itstactical.com/2009/11/13/mayflower-rc-low-profile-armor-carrier-and-uw-chest-rig/comment-page-1/#comment-22792</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 02:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itstactical.com/?p=2597#comment-22792</guid>
		<description>Where did you get that desert digital patterned one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did you get that desert digital patterned one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nailz</title>
		<link>http://www.itstactical.com/2009/11/13/mayflower-rc-low-profile-armor-carrier-and-uw-chest-rig/comment-page-1/#comment-22135</link>
		<dc:creator>Nailz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 14:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itstactical.com/?p=2597#comment-22135</guid>
		<description>So that&#039;s the Gen IV chest rig on there or is the QD?  I&#039;m assuming the QD because it doesn&#039;t come with pouches and the ones you are showing aren&#039;t the same as those shown on the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So that&#8217;s the Gen IV chest rig on there or is the QD?  I&#8217;m assuming the QD because it doesn&#8217;t come with pouches and the ones you are showing aren&#8217;t the same as those shown on the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ITS Admin</title>
		<link>http://www.itstactical.com/2009/11/13/mayflower-rc-low-profile-armor-carrier-and-uw-chest-rig/comment-page-1/#comment-2982</link>
		<dc:creator>ITS Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itstactical.com/?p=2597#comment-2982</guid>
		<description>Henshman,

Thanks for sharing your experiences! 

Mayflower lists this on their Web site &quot;For our tactical products we use Halotech FR fabric which is tested using the vertical flame ASTMD6143-99 method and is approved for use by NAVAIR and Air Warrior.&quot; Looks as if they&#039;re already using FR fabric.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henshman,</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing your experiences! </p>
<p>Mayflower lists this on their Web site &#8220;For our tactical products we use Halotech FR fabric which is tested using the vertical flame ASTMD6143-99 method and is approved for use by NAVAIR and Air Warrior.&#8221; Looks as if they&#8217;re already using FR fabric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: henshman</title>
		<link>http://www.itstactical.com/2009/11/13/mayflower-rc-low-profile-armor-carrier-and-uw-chest-rig/comment-page-1/#comment-2972</link>
		<dc:creator>henshman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itstactical.com/?p=2597#comment-2972</guid>
		<description>To elaborate on some of the comments above...I too have worn the Mayflower Gear in a competitve tactical arena. The rig is extremely well designed and allows for freedom of movement that I have not seen before in a tactical vest. I hope that Mayflower contacts Natick Labs and PEO Soldier to pass along a fire resistant version.
The setup would be an excellent addition to the Army&#039;s Air Warrior equipment list. The military/LE communities should take notice of Mayflower and their product development.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To elaborate on some of the comments above&#8230;I too have worn the Mayflower Gear in a competitve tactical arena. The rig is extremely well designed and allows for freedom of movement that I have not seen before in a tactical vest. I hope that Mayflower contacts Natick Labs and PEO Soldier to pass along a fire resistant version.<br />
The setup would be an excellent addition to the Army&#8217;s Air Warrior equipment list. The military/LE communities should take notice of Mayflower and their product development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.itstactical.com/2009/11/13/mayflower-rc-low-profile-armor-carrier-and-uw-chest-rig/comment-page-1/#comment-2957</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itstactical.com/?p=2597#comment-2957</guid>
		<description>Most carriers are bulky and start to weight you down after being worn for hours, not this system. After wearing this system over a three day SWAT event, I am convinced this is the best tactical plate carrier on the market!! Comfort is important!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most carriers are bulky and start to weight you down after being worn for hours, not this system. After wearing this system over a three day SWAT event, I am convinced this is the best tactical plate carrier on the market!! Comfort is important!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.itstactical.com/2009/11/13/mayflower-rc-low-profile-armor-carrier-and-uw-chest-rig/comment-page-1/#comment-2945</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 01:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itstactical.com/?p=2597#comment-2945</guid>
		<description>Great review; thanks.  Will stay tuned to see how the velocity panels compare to FBI protocol. No doubt they fit the mayflower carrier perfectly, so if they&#039;re 100% aramid or pass Doc&#039;s tests, even better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review; thanks.  Will stay tuned to see how the velocity panels compare to FBI protocol. No doubt they fit the mayflower carrier perfectly, so if they&#8217;re 100% aramid or pass Doc&#8217;s tests, even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://www.itstactical.com/2009/11/13/mayflower-rc-low-profile-armor-carrier-and-uw-chest-rig/comment-page-1/#comment-2944</link>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 01:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itstactical.com/?p=2597#comment-2944</guid>
		<description>Mayflower&#039;s plate carrier is higher quality, lighter weight, and a less restrictive vest that provides better protection.  Wearing this vest has the feel of wearing another piece of clothing, not a piece of ballistic tac gear. There&#039;s nothing else you could  want from your plate carrier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mayflower&#8217;s plate carrier is higher quality, lighter weight, and a less restrictive vest that provides better protection.  Wearing this vest has the feel of wearing another piece of clothing, not a piece of ballistic tac gear. There&#8217;s nothing else you could  want from your plate carrier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://www.tacticalgeardigest.com</title>
		<link>http://www.itstactical.com/2009/11/13/mayflower-rc-low-profile-armor-carrier-and-uw-chest-rig/comment-page-1/#comment-2941</link>
		<dc:creator>http://www.tacticalgeardigest.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itstactical.com/?p=2597#comment-2941</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Mayflower R&amp;C Low-Profile Armor Package &#124; ITS Tactical...&lt;/strong&gt;

ITS Tactical reviews the Mayflower Research &amp; Consulting Low-Profile Armor Carrier and UW Chest Rig....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Mayflower R&amp;C Low-Profile Armor Package | ITS Tactical&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>ITS Tactical reviews the Mayflower Research &amp; Consulting Low-Profile Armor Carrier and UW Chest Rig&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
