This year I attended the SOMA Conference for the first time as an actual SOMA member. While I’ve been going... View ArticleView Article
While we cover many aspects of lock picking on ITS Tactical, our disclaimer has always been that this information is presented so everyone can learn the “illusion” of security and how thinking a standard lock is going to protect your loved ones or your valuables is a misnomer.
The Locksport community was designed for just this purpose and the recreational challenge of lock picking. What we’d like to do with this article is to introduce you to the concepts behind Lock Picking Forensics and why this seemingly untraceable method of entry is becoming a thing of the past.
Leave no Trace?
Lock Picking leaves marks, period. No matter how good thieves are at picking locks, what kind of entry tool they use or even what method employed, marks are left. In some situations, this may take a microscope or macro photography to see, but more than likely in a criminal situation they’ll be raking a lock and want to gain access as fast as possible, thus leaving deeper marks. This is also indicative of their skill level, as amateurs take longer to open a lock; leaving significantly more evidence behind.
Now you may be asking how this differs from the marks that a key leaves when being inserted into a lock? If you think about a key being inserted into a lock and turned, the key glides over the pins in a direct line front-to-back pattern because it’s aligned in the keyway. When the plug is rotated, it also has a concentric rubbing pattern on the pins.
While this article is just a starting point in our discussion about lock picking forensics, we wanted to provide you with a few basic principles. Like the “illusion” of security mentioned above, there’s also the “illusion” that lock picking is an invisible method of entry. The truth is, it’s definitely not. We hope that Law Enforcement and insurance companies will eventually have the capability to use lock picking forensics. We have heard of some Law Enforcement using lock picking forensics already and hopefully it becomes widely adopted.
The big problem right now is with insurance claims, where without signs of forced entry, they won’t process loss claims. Does anyone here have any experience with a denied claim due to lack of forced entry evidence?
Leave a comment with your thoughts on lock picking forensics, do you see it as a good thing?
Are you getting more than 14¢ of value per day from ITS Tactical?
Please consider joining our Crew Leader Membership and our growing community of supporters.
At ITS Tactical we’re working hard every day to provide different methods, ideas and knowledge that could one day save your life. Instead of simply asking for your support with donations, we’ve developed a membership to allow our readers to support what we do and allow us to give you back something in return.
For less than 14¢ a day you can help contribute directly to our content, and join our growing community of supporters who have directly influenced what we’ve been able to accomplish and where we’re headed.
Just an idea...What about bumpkeys?
If you use a rubber washer around your bumpkey, you won't make any dent to the front face of the lock and you won't scratch any pins from the lock you're trying to open...
Just an idea...What about bumpkeys? If you use a rubber washer around your bumpkey, you won't make any dent to the front face of the lock and you won't scratch any pins from the lock you're trying to open...
Good write up... I've used in the past for some research. http://www.lockpickingforensics.com sure you've seen it but it goes pretty deep into the forensics aspects of lockpicking... cool stuff
I've followed this a fantastic (and free) lock forensics site for ages. Well worth your time:
I've followed this a fantastic (and free) lock forensics site for ages. Well worth your time: http://www.lockpickingforensics.com/ cheers, Christopher