Vertical Fore Grip versus Handguard Grip, Which is Better? - ITS Tactical
 

Vertical Fore Grip versus Handguard Grip, Which is Better?

By Jeff Gonzales

Vertical Fore Grip

In the rifle world, there are two main camps regarding a shooter’s weak hand placement on the rifle. The two common methods are divided into those individuals that simply use the fore-end of the handguard and those that utilize a vertical fore grip. Which is better?

Recruit, Recruit, Recruit

I’ve shot both ways extensively for decades and honestly, a lot of it is going to depend on your strength, shot requirements and technique. Do I think one is better than the other? As I look at both of them, I favor more of a standard grip with my weak hand on the fore-end. The biggest reason why, is that I get to integrate more of the muscular chain when I do so.

If you’ve been paying attention to some of the recent articles we’ve done, you’ve probably picked up on the emphasis we place on strength, power and fitness. This all ties into our shooting technique. There are some shooters who use a biomechanically week shooting technique, versus those that will integrate the muscular chain to help bring the weapon system tighter into their body. The latter grip of using your weak hand in a more traditional manner will allow you to exploit more of the muscular chain. However, it does come at a price.

Hold Your Horses

That price is the requirement of a powerful grip. Recently when I was shooting the new promotional video for the TRICON MK6 rifle, I realized how much I wasn’t gripping the rifle. Most shooters fail to adequately grip, which adversely affects your ability to pull the weapon system into the shoulder pocket. Using the vertical fore grip promoted a tad bit of laziness. Yes that’s correct, I said lazy.

It’s lazy in the sense the shooter relies more on the vertical surface rather than gripping and employing the complete muscular chain. This starts from the fingers and moves all the way through the arms, the shoulders and ends with the upper back torso region. The other problem I saw with the vertical fore grip was either that the shooter was wrapping the thumb around the grip completely, or the primary digits were the only ones gripping. Both promote a weak technique.

Vertical Fore Grip

ITS HQ Rifle circa 2009

Could it Be that Hard?

If you’re using the fore-end in a traditional manner, there again is a point of diminishing returns. The further away from your body your extremities get, the weaker they are. In the case of shooting, we need them to be strong. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure this out and while some people argue, I see it more as a biomechanical fact. Take a 10 pound weight and hold it out at full extension. See how long you can do that, then bend your arm bringing the weight closer to your body. Now see which you can hold the longest. Not a true scientific study, but it does reek of common sense, which is always a good thing.

Stabilization = Happy Shooter

Why do I bring all of this up? I do so because strength and power equals increased stability. Increased stability equals increased accuracy. I’m sure we’ve all seen our sight wobble across the target, if you haven’t, then you’re probably doing something really correct or really incorrect. The sight wobble is common and it won’t ever completely go away. On top of that, the longer you hold the weapon, the more wobble you’re going to see. When you integrate a powerful grip with a strong mount, you’re going to see huge improvements in your ability to stabilize your shooting platform for longer periods.

So, which is better for you? That all depends on your strength, shot requirements and technique.

Editor-in-Chief’s Note: Jeff Gonzales was a decorated and respected US Navy SEAL, serving as an operator and trainer who participated in numerous combat operations throughout the world. He now uses his modern warfare expertise as President of Trident Concepts, LLC., a battle proven company specializing in weapons, tactics and techniques to meet the evolving threat. Bringing the same high-intensity mindset, operational success and lessons learned from NSW to their training programs, TRICON has been recognized as an industry leader by various federal, state and local units. Organizations interested in training with TRICON can call 928-925-7038 or visit tridentconcepts.com for more information.

Are you getting more than 14¢ of value per day from ITS?

Thanks to the generosity of our supporting members, we’ve eliminated annoying ads and obtrusive content. We want your experience here at ITS to be beneficial and enjoyable.

At ITS, our goal is to provide different methods, ideas and knowledge that could one day save your life. If you’re interested in supporting our mission and joining our growing community of supporters, click below to learn more.

Discussion

8 comments
NoahJens
NoahJens

hey there, im curious who makes that rifle bag? any help would be awesome

tcwright
tcwright

There are two distinct forms of recoil when a shot is fired.  The first of which is from the conservation of momentum that occurs between the bullet-gun system, the second, and more significant, form of recoil is when the bullet exits the muzzle and the hot expanding gasses following the bullet are released from the muzzle and causes the muzzle to behave similarly to a rocket. Mechanically speaking, an effective way to mitigate this secondary recoil is to place your non-firing hand as close to the muzzle as possible.  This limits the moment (torque) caused by the secondary recoil on your non-firing hand.

moment = force x distance.   Therefore, reduce the distance and you minimize the moment.

KenJones1
KenJones1

Well, considering we're taught the "sul position" and the "safety circle" when maneuvering in close quarters, trying to hang onto a vertical foregrip and bringing the weapon to bear without sifting my hand position is near impossible.  Same with the "grab the mag well" hand position.  I also choke way up on the grip, even to the point I'm grabbing the gas block.  Yes, drills cause my hand to smart and move back, but it's natural for me to grip well forward.  If I could build my own and carry that, I'd probably go for a 12" or 14" fore grip depending on the barrel, compensater, etc.


I also seem to shoot better with my support hand well forward versus back towards the mag well.  I feel I can steer the weapon better.

stevbarto
stevbarto

I hate the vfg.  I put one on my rifle and found myself still gripping the forend, its more natural when you pull the weapon into your shoulder, better control as well I feel like.

backyardsniper
backyardsniper

One of the most natural feeling ways for me is the Magpul angled foregrip close in on the forend.

SurvivalPunk
SurvivalPunk

I've only ever gripped the foreend. Something about a vertical grip I don't like. 

RKlenka
RKlenka

Mag grip all day every day.

KevinZuniga
KevinZuniga

"Yes that’s correct, I said lazy." Best part of the article - Navy Seal and all-around badass makes completely sure you heard him right...

Do you have what you need to prevail?

Shop the ITS Store for exclusive merchandise, equipment and hard to find tactical gear.

Do you have what you need to prevail? Tap the button below to see what you’re missing.