Meltdown: What a Nuclear Power Disaster Could Mean to the Electrical Grid - ITS Tactical
 

Meltdown: What a Nuclear Power Disaster Could Mean to the Electrical Grid

By The ITS Crew

nuclear-power-02

Close your eyes and picture the future 50 years from now. Perhaps you’re imagining hover cars, teleportation or even bionic technology? No matter what your vision is for the cities of the future, they’ll most likely be run on nuclear power.

For years, nuclear power has been expanding and we’re constantly being reassured of its safety and security. However, many people are unaware of the threats nuclear power stations could be facing from both mankind and Mother Nature. Today, we’ll be discussing a June 2015 report from the American Leadership & Policy Foundation entitled, Electromagnetic Pulse and Space Weather and the Strategic Threat to America’s Nuclear Power Stations.

Before we get too far into the specific report details of the threats these stations may be facing, let’s first examine some of the history behind nuclear power stations.

The World of Tomorrow

nuclear-power-07

While the first nuclear power station began operating in 1954, research and experiments on nuclear power date back to the early 1930’s with Ernest Rutherford’s discovery of the power created by splitting lithium atoms. The early 1950’s saw a race between nations to bring nuclear power to life as the United States, USSR, United Kingdom and Canada all rushed to harness the power of the atom.

In the United States, the 1954 Amendments to the Atomic Energy Act allowed declassification of reactor technology to encourage development in the private sector. In the end, the first operating reactor was in Obinsk, Russia and provided 5 megawatts of electricity to a power grid. The next thirty years would see massive developments in nuclear power, with stations producing under 1 gigawatt, all the way up to 300.

Disasters Strike

nuclear-power-05

On March 28, 1979 a nuclear power station in Dauphin County, Pennsylvania experienced a partial meltdown after failures in the non-nuclear secondary system and a stuck-open relief valve allowed large amounts of reactor coolant to escape. The accident became known as the Three Mile Island accident. In addition to the mechanical issues, training failures within the staff meant they weren’t able to recognize the issue and in one instance, a hidden indicator light caused an operator to manually override an emergency cooling system.

April 26, 1986 saw the worst nuclear accident in history at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in Pripyat, Ukraine. An explosion and fire released large quantities of radioactive particles into the atmosphere, spreading over the USSR and Europe. 31 people died during the accident itself and the long-term effects of the incident are still unknown to this day.

Nuclear Power Today

nuclear-power-04

While previous nuclear disasters created numerous regulations and safety concerns, the growth of nuclear power stations has climbed and there are currently 438 power stations in 31 countries. These 438 stations provide roughly 10% of the world’s power and approximately 1/4 of the stations are located in 30 U.S. States.

To protect public health and safety, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission was created in 1975 and most of the regulations followed by power stations within the United States come from the NRC. Despite their responsibilities, the NRC is behind the times when it comes to updated regulations, many of which remain unchanged since the 1980’s.

This brings us back to the recent report from the American Leadership & Policy Foundation, outlining their concerns of the vulnerabilities nuclear power stations across the U.S. could face from both electromagnetic pulse and space weather.

Electromagnetic Pulses

nuclear-emp-circuit-board

While it may sound like it comes straight out of a Tom Clancy novel, Electromagnetic Pulses (EMPs) are a very real threat we face today. These pulses can be generated through a nuclear explosion and are comprised of three phases. The first phase, HEMP, is an electromagnetic signal generated by a nuclear burst detonated high above the Earth – generally above the atmosphere. These are fast, narrow pulses that are considered one of the more devastating EMP effects on sensitive electronics, due to their speed and disruptive characteristics.

Phase 2 of an EMP is known as an Intermediate Time Hemp and these signals are similar to lightning in the way they interact with electronic devices. Common surge protectors can sometimes enable an electronic device to withstand these signals, as they’re not as devastating as Phase 1 signals. The final phase of an EMP is known as a Late Time Hemp or magnetohydrodynamic (MHD). These signals can actually be found in nature through events known as Geomagnetic Disturbances (GMD).

While EMPs don’t pose a direct threat to the human body, they will severely damage electronic components, including circuit boards and power transformers found throughout electrical grids. Think back to the last time your power was out and how crippling it can be. Imagine a permanent outage across a large area and you can understand why an EMP pulse could be extremely devastating.

Space Weather

nuclear-power-06

In addition to the manmade EMPs that would be produced from an exploding nuclear device, studies have shown that solar flares and other space weather events can create similar pulses that could mimic the effects of a manmade EMP. These pulses can develop from Geomagnetic Storms, where energy pulses race down geomagnetic lines of the Earth.

While these pulses are similar to the weaker third phase of an EMP, they can encompass much more area due to the size of the solar storm. In addition, these pulses can last much longer than a manmade EMP, allowing the pulses more time to damage electronics, including power grids.

What This Means for Nuclear Power

nuclear-power-08

Scientists and those at the American Leadership & Policy Foundation are concerned with not only the implications of EMPs and Space Weather on the power grid, but the impact it could have on nuclear power facilities. Our entire nation’s infrastructure is built on our electric grid and a failure at any level would be devastating to public health and safety.

In addition to the devastation of the electrical grid, additional failures at nuclear power plants could result in meltdowns across the nation. A large amount of emergency systems and monitoring equipment at these stations include delicate electronics that would be devastated by an EMP. While both the White House and Congress claim that threats to U.S. Infrastructure and society are a top priority, EMP and Space Weather has been ignored by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The NRC continues to base its policy on this issue on an obsolete 1982 study they conducted.

This recent report seeks to shed light on the vulnerabilities surrounding both power stations and the electrical grids nationwide and we encourage you to read the report in its entirety, sharing as you see fit.

Additional Resources 

Are you getting more than 14¢ of value per day from ITS?

Thanks to the generosity of our supporting members, we’ve eliminated annoying ads and obtrusive content. We want your experience here at ITS to be beneficial and enjoyable.

At ITS, our goal is to provide different methods, ideas and knowledge that could one day save your life. If you’re interested in supporting our mission and joining our growing community of supporters, click below to learn more.

Discussion

11 comments
Tony1947
Tony1947

Having worked as an engineer in the power industry for over 30 years I can understand the concern.  Unfortunately it does not match the operational reality.   Of the over 100 nuclear plants in operation all have loss of power safeguards installed on their transmission line interfaces.  If there is loss of connection on a transmission line due to any lightning strike or EMP, the plants are designed to go into automatic shutdown and the ancillary power at that plants are energized to ensure the reactor cools down properly.  This was the universal design change made after Three Mile Island.  The issue that may be of concern is if the control systems in the plant are EMP proof. EMP control systems shielding is (relatively) not that expensive compared to the cost or replacing over 100 nuclear plants.  You could be talking about construction of hundreds of billions of dollars of new plants for a 0.0001% scenario.  Since Three Mile Island the nuclear power plants have proven extremely reliable and the US power grid is robust with redundancies to ensure 99.99% reliability.   Nonetheless, the EMP issue should be re-evaluated.

ALPFwebAdmin
ALPFwebAdmin

"I have reviewed the EMP & Space Weather & The Strategic Threat to America's Nuclear Power Stations and found it to be an excellent presentation of what we know and what we don't know about this very complex threat to all of our critical infrastructures, not just our nuclear stations. This report provides a solid foundation for our Nation to build upon as we move to harden and protect our critical infrastructures."

- Scott McBride, Idaho National Laboratory, Infrastructure Security Manager

"Of all the potential catastrophic consequences of an EMP, nuclear power reactor vulnerability is among the worst, and by itself constitutes an existential threat to society. This timely and important study on the threat posed by the vulnerability of nuclear power reactors to natural and manmade EMP is must reading for policymakers, and hopefully will move them to act to protect the electric grid now--before it is too late."

- Dr. Peter Vincent Pry, Executive Director, Congressional Task Force on National and Homeland Security

“The paper by David Stuckenberg and Herschel Campbell is a well-researched and solid analysis of black swan events that could result in the next Fukushima disaster unless the hazards are sincerely considered and steps undertaken to responsibly manage the risks.”

- Dave Lochbaum, Union of Concerned Scientist, Director of Nuclear Safety Project

siegrisj
siegrisj

This article had a lot of potential.. needed to be like 3x longer though. Heck even an article on the fragility of our power grid and different zones etc would make for a great article on its own.

Jack Timar
Jack Timar

Going a little Coast to Coast AM today, aren't we?

American Leadership & Policy Foundation - ALPF
American Leadership & Policy Foundation - ALPF

Jack, did you actually read the 40+ page report? If you had, it's likely you would've responded with more than a pithy quip. ALPF's research is meant to enlighten citizens and leaders on key issues they may be unaware of. In addition, this research has been vetted and peer reviewed by the best scientists in industry and government. There is no conspiracy just a technical vulnerability that happens to be strategic in nature.

Brad Armstrong
Brad Armstrong

Take a pot of legitimate-sounding science, add a few cups of completely ignorant "fact"sound-a-likes, stir and pour into a slick-looking web interface and allow to harden ... serve with a light sprinkling of righteous indignation and a side of concern ... and you have the best BS money can buy! 300 Gigawatts?? Meltdowns from failed electronics?? Three Mile Island melted down due to a mechanical failure?? The NRC is out of touch with how modern nuclear power plants function?? Someone at this site doesn't have clue about how a nuclear power station is set up - best stay in the shallow end of the nuclear power debate for your own safety.

ALPFwebAdmin
ALPFwebAdmin

Concerned about legitimacy?

"I have reviewed the EMP & Space Weather & The Strategic Threat to America's Nuclear Power Stations and found it to be an excellent presentation of what we know and what we don't know about this very complex threat to all of our critical infrastructures, not just our nuclear stations. This report provides a solid foundation for our Nation to build upon as we move to harden and protect our critical infrastructures."

- Scott McBride, Idaho National Laboratory, Infrastructure Security Manager

"Of all the potential catastrophic consequences of an EMP, nuclear power reactor vulnerability is among the worst, and by itself constitutes an existential threat to society. This timely and important study on the threat posed by the vulnerability of nuclear power reactors to natural and manmade EMP is must reading for policymakers, and hopefully will move them to act to protect the electric grid now--before it is too late."

- Dr. Peter Vincent Pry, Executive Director, Congressional Task Force on National and Homeland Security

“The paper by David Stuckenberg and Herschel Campbell is a well-researched and solid analysis of black swan events that could result in the next Fukushima disaster unless the hazards are sincerely considered and steps undertaken to responsibly manage the risks.”

- Dave Lochbaum, Union of Concerned Scientist, Director of Nuclear Safety Project

American Leadership & Policy Foundation - ALPF
American Leadership & Policy Foundation - ALPF

Brad, if you can find one substantive fault with this research - please stepforward. This information is sound. This is not an effort to diminish nuclear power... The research indicates more must be done to enhance safety. Most backup systems will not survive an EMP/GMD.

John Henry
John Henry

FYI nuclear power plants have multiple methods to safely shut down the reactor. Multiple safety systems from multiple different types of control methods. Don't believe all the anti nuclear bs. And the statement that the NRC doesn't implement updates in timely matters is bs also. Literally immediately after Fukushima we were implementing alternative means of fuel pool cooling methods.

American Leadership & Policy Foundation - ALPF
American Leadership & Policy Foundation - ALPF

John, the report on nuclear power plants and EMP is endorsed by some of America's leading nuclear scientists... To read the endorsements visit: ALPF.org. The backup systems you speak of will be incapacitated in a GMD/EMP scenario. These systems are what the study examined.

Jeff House
Jeff House

I am within 30 miles of a reactor...my plans have a tinge of this reality to them.

Do you have what you need to prevail?

Shop the ITS Store for exclusive merchandise, equipment and hard to find tactical gear.

Do you have what you need to prevail? Tap the button below to see what you’re missing.