A Gentleman’s Inch – Ridiculous Dialogue Episode 46

ridiculous-dialogue-episode-46-main

Episode 46

On this episode, Bryan, Rob and Matt are joined by our special guest, Jarrod.  The guys discuss the pitfalls of talking over speakerphone, Bluedouches and Dad Robes.

They also questioned Taco Bell’s marketing, Amazon Prime Now’s lighting fast delivery and how to eat 25 calories of Pizza.

cast-of-characters-46-02

Ridiculous Dialogue was created to share the banter that takes place at Imminent Threat Solutions on a daily basis. It’s us; candid, unedited and talking about everything from what movies we’re watching to the general geekiness that keeps us laughing here at ITS HQ.

While we generally keep the vibe in our articles PG rated, be warned, it may not be safe to blast over your speakers at work. We hope you enjoy the insight into ITS and who we are behind the scenes as a company; pull up a chair and tune in to Radio ITS.

Posted in Podcast | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Gear Tasting 27: Lock Picking, Hoptic Accessories and a Box Full of Knives

gear-tasting-27-main

On this episode, Bryan showcases some new arrivals from Hoptic USA and uses our new ITS Visible Cutaway Practice Locks to whiteboard a primer on Lock Picking. He also walks through his knife collection on our most dangerous segment of Questions Over Coffee yet.

If you’re enjoying Gear Tasting each week, please consider supporting ITS by joining our Crew Leader Membership and allow us to give you something back in return.

Resources

ITS Discreet Messenger Bag Walkthrough – http://itstac.tc/1VHlA7Q
Hoptic USA – http://www.hopticusa.com/
Visible Cutaway Practice Locks – http://itstac.tc/1KnuArb
SEAL Knife Trials – http://bit.ly/1WLNYpv
Mad Dog ATAK 2 – http://bit.ly/1QguGYO
SOG Seal Pup – http://amzn.to/1Q4GKLq
Buckmaster – http://www.buck-184.com/
MK3 Mod 0 – http://amzn.to/1QgoS1w
Cold Steel SRK – http://amzn.to/1KO2L29
PDW Griffin – http://bit.ly/15Plu9E
MT Knives – http://mtknives.net/
Emerson CQC 7 – http://bit.ly/15Plu9E
Emerson Commander – http://amzn.to/1T9QRCR
Emerson SOCFK – http://amzn.to/24rBgSn
Knife Rights – http://kniferights.org/
Hissatsu – http://amzn.to/1SXJNc5
ITS Memorial Bracelet – http://itstac.tc/1p95Vnm

In each episode of Gear Tasting, Imminent Threat Solutions Editor-in-Chief Bryan Black answers your gear-related questions and shares his insight into what we’re currently evaluating at ITS HQ.

For more on the gear we review, check out our GEARCOM category here on ITS.

To have your gear related question answered on an upcoming episode, tweet us using the poundtag #GearTasting on Twitter.

Posted in Gear Tasting | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

SITREP 01: Nissan LEAF Hacked and Preparing for Southern Storms

nissan-leaf-main

SITREPs are our timely updates on developing news and interests discovered on our journey through the Interwebs.

The Nissan LEAF is currently the world’s best selling electric car. One of the features of the LEAF is the NissanConnect app and Troy Hunt has released a blog post today detailing a seriously vulnerability through the app.

Troy discovered that Nissan’s app doesn’t require much authentication past the VIN number and that the app provides a large amount of information when querying it. This enabled him to remotely access information about the vehicle’s status and history, as well as the ability to manipulate some of the vehicle’s features.

Hunt provided Nissan information about this exploit on January 23rd and advised them that he would be making a public post on the issue sometime this week. Staff from the Nissan Information Security Threat Intelligence informed him that they were, “…making progress toward a solution.”

Click here to read the full article on TroyHunt.com

Deadly Southern Storms

tornado-01

Several storms along the Gulf Coast have claimed the lives of at least three people and are continuing toward the Carolina area. The storms included high winds up to 70 mph, hail and tornados. They were so fierce, teams at the local National Weather Service center were forced to take cover and utilize backup radars after lightning took out their main.

If you’re in these southern areas, be sure that you’re reviewing and updating your safety plans and kits. During an emergency is not the time to discover worn, broken or missing equipment. Check out the following articles on ITS for ideas and guides for emergency planning.

For those in the North Texas area, SKYWARN™ Spotter Training classes are available through the National Weather Forecast Office. Click here to see a list of upcoming classes in your area.

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Knot of the Week Video: Shorten or Bypass a Damaged Section of Rope with the Sheepshank

kotw-sheepshank-main-01

On today’s Knot of the Week, we’ll be going over another of my favorites, the Sheepshank. It’s namesake comes from its supposed resemblance to a meaty legbone, but I can’t really see that. Nevertheless, the Sheepshank is a fantastic hitch that can be used to either shorten a rope, or bypass a damaged section of rope.

Sheepshank » Hitches

(Strength: 4/Security: 4/Stability: 4/Difficulty: 3) See below for what these ratings mean.

If you’re ever working around ropes this knot could potentiality mean the difference between having a useless rope and one that will carry you through. Despite internet murmurs and controversy surrounding whether the Sheepshank will hold under load, I’ll say that if you avoid cheap nylon rope, you should be good. I’ve personally tested the Sheepshank with good climbing rope (Bluewater Static Assaultline, 11mm) and it’s held approx. 200 lbs. under load with no slipping.

That being said, the Sheepshank shouldn’t be used with dynamic rope, only static. You don’t want to add the additional shock of a long fall to an already damaged rope, no matter what knot is tied. Stick with only using the knot to bypass damage in an emergency situation, where there are no other alternatives.

Hasty Sheepshank » Hitches

(Strength: 3/Security: 2/Stability: 2/Difficulty: 2) See below for what these ratings mean.

In the video linked above, I also demonstrate a hasty method for tying a Sheepshank and mention that you should only use this for shortening and not so much in lifesaving situations. It’s a quick method using loops, where the damaged area would wind up on the top of the middle loop.

As you can see, the security and stability take a big hit with the hasty method. Check out the embedded video above for more.

Ratings

Strength/Security/Stability/Difficulty

Each knot will be assigned a rating from 1-5 (1 representing the lowest score) based on the following four properties:

Strength – All knots will weaken the strength of  a rope, however, there are knots that are stronger than others. The scale here will reflect how strong the rope remains with the specified knot.

Security – The security scale refers to how well the knot will stay tied, and resist coming loose under a normal load.

Stability – Stability refers to how easily the knot will come untied under an abnormal load (i.e. the knot being pulled in a direction it was not intended to) A lower score here represents instability.

Difficulty – The lower the number, the easier a knot is to tie.

Posted in Lashings | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Is Political Correctness Literally Killing Our Society?

political-correctness-01

I loved growing up as a kid, sleeping with my windows open and sometimes even the doors open. It was a great time to be a kid for sure, but today we live in a drastically different world.

The Rise of Political Correctness

Today, we’re left to deal with the dangers of our politically correct society; one where society paints good guys as bad. If you choose to carry a firearm, defend yourself, or even consider taking another human’s life to protect a loved one, you’re demonized. It’s a sad state indeed, but we’re finally reaping what we’ve sowed.

political-correctness-02

It shouldn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out many crimes are targeted against defenseless or weak targets. I wonder why that is; I wonder if we could look at the animal kingdom and see a similar pattern? Could it be that the lioness is chasing after the weaker of the prey in order to guarantee a meal? If she fails to catch and kill her prey, she doesn’t eat. It really is that simple; in order to increase the chances of success, evil will choose the weaker or soft target.

The Truth Will Set You Free

political-correctness-03

A new study released by Stanford University entitled Mass Shootings of America or MSA has determined that most mass shootings were largely conducted in “gun free” zones. This is my surprised face. If anyone is still convinced gun free zones are safe, they’re ignorant.

“The definition of mass shooting used for the Stanford database is 3 or more shooting victims (not necessarily fatalities), not including the shooter. The shooting must not be identifiably gang or drug related. The motive typically appears to be indiscriminate killing.”

Statistics can always be skewed to fit one narrative, but common sense and understanding predatory mindset would help bridge the gap and provide insight into a smarter choice. I’m hopeful that this new study will help us achieve an open dialogue with the anti-gun crowd, in hopes of abolishing the gun free zones. At the very least, acknowledging the unintended consequences of gun free zones as being criminal/terrorist empowerment zones.

United We Stand

political-correctness-04

We live in a society where we have rules and laws we must follow. We must collectively work to address the harsh reality that criminal and terrorist elements are, by nature, not going to follow the law. If we can agree on this premise, it sets the stage to intelligently discuss how to go about better protecting the weak and defenseless.

If we know they’ll more than likely target gun free zones, what can we do to help deter them from doing so? Many are quick to comment that the presence of armed, uniformed officers or security guards is enough and while I believe it’s a step in the right direction, it’s not the only solution.

Real Solutions for Real Problems

We have to recognize that this will require more than the begrudging acceptance of an armed, uniformed officer on site. It will require us to seriously look at doing away with gun free zones and allowing the citizenry to defend themselves.

Why is this such a hard concept to grasp and why is there so much push back? My gut tells me it’s simply about control. There are many groups within our country who don’t want life, liberty or the pursuit of happiness to be extolled. Instead, they want you to fall in line and live according to their ideas. If that notion doesn’t scare the crap out of you, then you’re probably on the wrong side of this discussion.

It’s predatory instinct to target the weak and defenseless, but it’s also a human right to defend your life.

Editor-in-Chief’s Note: Jeff Gonzales was a decorated and respected US Navy SEAL, serving as an operator and trainer who participated in numerous combat operations throughout the world. He now uses his modern warfare expertise as President of Trident Concepts, LLC., a battle proven company specializing in weapons, tactics and techniques to meet the evolving threat. Bringing the same high-intensity mindset, operational success and lessons learned from NSW to their training programs, TRICON has been recognized as an industry leader by various federal, state and local units. Organizations interested in training with TRICON can call 928-925-7038 or visit tridentconcepts.com for more info.

Posted in Mindset | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 22 Comments

The ITS Discreet Messenger Bag is Back!

dmb-grey-buckle-05

The ITS Discreet Messenger Bag represents 5 years of design, production and fielding of messenger bags for the US market. This iteration combines everything we’ve learned into one of the most rugged, dependable and modular messenger bags ever created.  We went back to the drawing board to create our modularity and succeeded in increasing the versatility of what the market has to offer.

its-dmb-20

dmb buckle change-3

By combining the bag’s four expandable interior SnapPockets™ with our optional ITS Zip Bags, we’ve developed a way to easily swap the contents of what you carry, based on the inevitability of your changing requirements. The side SnapPockets™ are perfect for a Nalgene or similar sized water bottles as well.

ITS Canvas Zip Bags

canvas-zip-bag-01

Built right here in Texas, our ITS Canvas Zip Bags represent our take on the classic zippered pouch. Made from Genuine Martexin Wax Canvas and featuring sewn webbing handles on each side, these not only facilitate easy retrieval from a bag, but also enable a fixed grip-point to aid in opening and closing the zipper. Additionally, we’ve sewn a 5“ wide x 1.5“ tall strip of loop Velcro to the front of each bag to enable custom nametapes to be affixed for identification of contents.

canvas-zip-bag-04

Available in Surplus Green or Midnight Black, each ITS Zip Bag measures 8.5” wide x 6” tall. While purpose built as an accessory for our Discreet Messenger Bag, the ITS Canvas Zip Bags can be used for anything you can think of.

ITS Tech Sleeve

its-tech-sleeve-04

Our padded Tech Sleeve for the ITS Discreet Messenger Bag can accommodate the majority of laptops, up to 15” using its adjustable design to expand as needed. A Velcro One Wrap Strip secures the top of the sleeve and is removable and repositionable.

The front features 5.5” elastic pockets sewn with four pen sized pockets, two 3.5” pockets for items like our EDC Trauma Kit or even an iPhone 6 Plus. There’s also two 2” pockets for flashlights and similar sized items.

Posted in ITS Information | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Gear Tasting 26: Zippo Tricks, Morning Workout Energy & Piston AR’s

gear-tasting-26-main

Today on Gear Tasting, Bryan shares a new butane torch insert for his Zippo lighter that’s perfect for cigars! He also answers some Questions Over Coffee, including how he has the energy to wake up at 0435 and the in’s and out’s of Piston AR manufacturers.

If you’re enjoying Gear Tasting each week, please consider supporting ITS by joining our Crew Leader Membership and allow us to give you something back in return.

Resources

ZPlus 2.0 Zippo Insert – http://amzn.to/1TphaTG
Apple Leather Case – http://amzn.to/1XAFIcR
LWRC – https://www.lwrci.com/
Larue Rail Clips – http://bit.ly/1RS8lBW

In each episode of Gear Tasting, Imminent Threat Solutions Editor-in-Chief Bryan Black answers your gear-related questions and shares his insight into what we’re currently evaluating at ITS HQ.

For more on the gear we review, check out our GEARCOM category here on ITS.

To have your gear related question answered on an upcoming episode, tweet us using the poundtag #GearTasting on Twitter.

Posted in Gear Tasting | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

FBI Tells Apple, “Just This Once.” Why a One Time Exception is a Slippery Slope

apple-encryption-03

Major news outlets and social media are ablaze today, with self-proclaimed pundits offering their analysis on Apple CEO Tim Cook’s recent Message to Customers.

A US District Court has issued a court order in an attempt to force Apple to “assist law enforcement agents in obtaining access to the data” on deceased San Bernardino terrorist Syed Rizwan Farook’s iPhone 5C.

Typical with any large-scale public event, much of what passes as informed opinion is, in fact, not so well-informed as it might pretend to be. In this article, I intend to take a look at the facts of the case, before digging into the ramifications of the court order and whether or not it’s technically feasible for Apple to comply.

A Situational Overview

apple-encryption-02

First, a little background information is in order. FBI data forensics have had this iPhone 5C in their possession for about two months, this is clear by backtracking to the date of the San Bernardino incident. Based on the contents of the court order, it can be presumed that the’ve been thwarted from gaining access to the contents of the device, due to the software lock on the phone. Circumvention of this software lock is the primary documented goal of the order, from which “technical assistance” has been demanded from Apple, the manufacturer of the device.

It can also safely be assumed that the version of the OS on the phone is greater than iOS 8, which was the first iteration of iOS to include “full encryption” of data contained on the device. This is also not the first time the Federal government has demanded that Apple assist them in dealing with encrypted devices made by Apple. The outcome of that case has still not been decided and Apple has requested that the court make a decision on whether the government can compel Apple to assist with the unlocking or not.

So understandably, the FBI feels that there’s information on the phone that may be useful either as part of the San Bernardino investigation, or in discovering evidence of future, or aborted attacks of a similar nature. Though they won’t know this without unlocking the phone first.

The nature of this potential evidence wouldn’t already be known, though useful information could have already been gathered. Information like the call records of Farook, (who he called, who called him, when and with what frequency) could have already been obtained from Verizon via court orders or subpoenas. Similar information about the electronic correspondence between the shooter and his contacts may have already been obtained directly from the service providers he used (eg: Google, Yahoo, other email providers.) Unless of course, Farook ran his own private email server like certain Presidential candidates, which is unlikely.

From the official narrative, we are to believe that the FBI has been manually attempting to unlock the iPhone in question over the last two months and have failed thus far. They’ve made no mention of other avenues of attack, despite there being a number of commercially available (and in at least one case, Federal intelligence-community funded) forensics tools in existence.

They then requested that the US District Court issue a court order, compelling Apple to provide the “technical assistance” they claim they need to access the data on the phone. Apple has issued their own response, in public, to that court order and it’s safe to assume that they’ve also replied, or will within the five day window provided by the court order, through more official channels.

The Court Order

Next, let’s take a look at the court order, itself, ED 15-0451M, as issued by the United States District Court for Central District of California:

For good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

  1. Apple shall assist in enabling the search of a cellular telephone, Apple make: iPhone 5C, Model A1532, P/N: MGFG2LL/A, S/N: FFMNQ3MTG2DJ, IMEI: 358820052301412, on the Verizon Network, (the “SUBJECT DEVICE”) pursuant to a warrant of this Court by providing reasonable technical assistance to assist law enforcement agents in obtaining access to the data on the SUBJECT DEVICE.

  2. Apple’s reasonable technical assistance shall accomplish the following three important functions: (1) it will bypass or disable the auto-erase function whether or not it has been enabled; (2) it will enable the FBI to submit passcode to the SUBJECT DEVICE for testing electronically via the physical device port, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or other protocol available on the SUBJECT DEVICE; and (3) it will ensure that when the FBI submits passcode to the SUBJECT DEVICE, software running on the device will not purposefully introduce any additional delay between passcode attempts beyond what is incurred by Apple hardware.

  3. Apple’s reasonable technical assistance may include, but is not limited to: providing the FBI with a signed iPhone Software file, recovery bundle, or other Software Image File (“SIF”) that can be loaded onto the SUBJECT DEVICE. The SIF will load and run from Random Access Memory (“RAM”) and will not modify the iOS on the actual phone, the user data partition or system partition on the device’s flash memory. The SIF will be coded by Apple with a unique identifier of the phone so that the SIF would only load and execute on the SUBJECT DEVICE. The SIF will be loaded via Device Firmware Upgrade (“DFU”) mode, recovery mode, or other applicable mode available to the FBI. Once active on the SUBJECT DEVICE, the SIF will accomplish the three functions specified in paragraph 2. The SIF will be loaded on the SUBJECT DEVICE at either a government facility, or alternatively, at an Apple facility; if the latter, Apple shall provide the government with remote access to the SUBJECT DEVICE through a computer allowing the government to conduct passcode recovery analysis.

  4. If Apple determines that it can achieve the three functions stated above in paragraph 2, as well as the functionality set forth in paragraph 3, using an alternate technological means from that recommended by the government, and the government concurs, Apple may comply with this Order in that way.

  5. Apple shall advise the government of the reasonable cost of providing this service.

  6. Although Apple shall make reasonable efforts to maintain the integrity of data on the SUBJECT DEVICE, Apple shall not be required to maintain copies of any user data as a result of the assistance ordered herein. All evidence preservation shall remain the responsibility of law enforcement agents.

  7. To the extent that Apple believes that compliance with this Order would be unreasonably burdensome, it may make an application to this Court for relief within five business days of receipt of the Order.

Technical Feasibility of the Court Order

To examine the technical feasibility, we must first have a solid understanding of what’s being demanded here. In examining the actual text of the court order, it becomes fairly clear that what the FBI wants is a means to circumvent the iOS software lock setting to automatically wipe the phone after ten failed attempts at entering a passcode.

It’s not clear whether they know if that setting is currently on or off and they may honestly not know, having not risked ten consecutive unlock attempts at a time. They also want to be able to enter the passcode electronically, rather than having someone sit there and type one passcode attempt at a time. They’ve demanded that the ability to enter passcode attempts via the Lightning port, Bluetooth or WiFi, be added to the phone. Finally, they’ve demanded that the passcode entry process not incur any non-hardware defined delays.

All of these features they’re demanding Apple provide, by means of creating a bootable version of the iPhone operating system, “iOS,” which either the Feds or Apple would install via the “firmware update process,” a “recovery mode” or some other unspecified “mode” of installation. They’ve gone ahead and specified that this modified version of the operating system, which does not currently exist, be created and then loaded only into the device’s RAM and not the flash memory.

What they haven’t actually demanded is that Apple provide a “backdoor key” to the encryption used by the device. Instead, they’ve asked that an entirely new version of the OS be developed to only run on this particular iPhone and that this version allow them infinite chances at brute forcing their way into the phone by electronic means, without defaulting to a self-reset of the entire device.

Is it possible for Apple to create a brand new version of the iOS that could turn off the auto-destruct feature? Technically and probably, yes. Is it possible for them to allow for unlocking attempts by some electronic means other than finger-on-touch-screen? Possibly, though this is more complicated than the layman may expect.

Finally, is it possible to make sure that no software-induced delays to the brute forcing attempts to break into the phone are introduced? Sure. But doing these things is neither simple or fast. Worse yet, the creation of this entirely separate iOS version for one-time Federal use is both a bad idea and sets a bad precedent for future uses, despite a one-line half-assed assurance in a poorly-worded court order that they only want it for this one phone, this one time.

Ramifications of Compliance with the Court Order

Despite the documented intent to have this “tool” for use only in this one case, this isn’t the first time they’ve asked for help in circumventing “locks” on smart phones from Apple. Once a tool like this exists, it will exist forever. Much like saying something stupid on the Internet, once it’s out there, it stays out there.

You can delete bad data, but chances are good there’s a copy of that data floating around from now until the end of time. Once you give the FBI a means of circumventing safeguards, they’ll either modify that one-time-use software to use again, or they’ll demand another one-time-use version of the operating system be developed the next time there’s a “unique case” that “requires” it.

Worse still, once that tool exists, can you trust that it won’t propagate? Are the FBI’s systems so secure that no bad actor could ever obtain a copy of that tool and use it with malicious intent? For that matter, can you even trust that no one within the FBI would never surreptitiously copy it and use it for their own personal reasons?

Currently, decryption is a computation-intense process. In time, as we get closer to having functional quantum computing power (and the Federal government is going to have it before anyone else does), decryption will become nearly trivial. In that sense, we’re in a societal window wherein encryption, for the moment, can be trusted to safeguard a person’s data against unlawful or even lawful attempts to thwart those protections provided by it.

Encryption does not make a distinction about the intentions of the encryption user; it works mathematically to render the encrypted data unreadable by anyone without the authority to decrypt it, whether that person is good or bad, engaged in lawful or illegal behavior. Encryption protects the privacy rights we all have.

Demanding that a corporation provide a loophole, or “back door” into that process is a dangerous precedent to set, for several reasons. First, it may not even be possible to do and second, once that “back door” is open, even if those who demand it promise to never do it again (and believe me, they will do it again), it remains open forever.

Other Options for Law Enforcement

It seems somewhat strange to think that the FBI has merely been tinkering at guessing the passcode for this particular phone, when forensics tools for just these purposes already exist. Pulling a copy of the entire device’s memory would be a good first step (and, in fact, is the Standard Operating Procedure when performing forensics on a data device), then using tools like Black Bag Technologies’ “Black Light” to analyze that data would help.

As an interesting side-note, “Black Bag Technologies” received funding from the CIA’s investment venture capital firm, In-Q-Tel, so their product suite is definitely a known quantity to the US Intelligence Community. There are other tools available as well, like Oxygen Forensics set of tools. Pulling useful data from seized devices is a known science and there are a number of experts in this field that would be more than willing to help.

All that said, I’d like to believe that the FBI is much more capable of analyzing data on the devices of criminal suspects than this court order would indicate. It either inspires little confidence in the technical forensics abilities at the federal agency, or is indicative of a political agenda to set a legal precedent for demanding major corporations go to ridiculous lengths to allow “back door” access that they make promises to never misuse in the future.

In that sense, I applaud Apple responding in the manner in which they have. As they’ve stated, they’re more than willing to comply with court orders for data contained on their own internal servers if legally mandated to, but providing a proverbial “one time key” for this sort of thing is a bad idea, both technically and ethically. By refusing to do so and making the public case for their refusal, they’re bringing the issue to a wide audience, who should rightly be involved in any such public discussion about the ramifications of such access and what it means to each of us, both criminal and non-criminal.

No one wants more terrorism in this country or anywhere else (well, no one but terrorists), but we have processes in place that preserve the liberty we currently enjoy and whittling those protections away is bad for all of us.

Update: In an attempt to answer more on the questions being raised on this issue, Apple has released the following information here: http://www.apple.com/customer-letter/answers/

Posted in Privacy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 72 Comments

Knot of the Week Video – Carry Your Drinks Using a Bottle Sling

kotw-bottle-sling-main

Ever broke a lid on your Nalgene or had a circular object you wished you could collar and lift? Look no further than the venerable Bottle Sling I’ll teach you how to tie on this week’s Knot of the Week. From what we’ve been able to find out, the bottle sling was first used by ancient greeks to not only carry jugs and bottles, but also as a surgical sling and traction device for dislocated joints.

Bottle Sling » Hitches

(Strength: 5/Security: 5/Stability: 3/Difficulty: 4) See below for what these ratings mean.

The bottle sling affords you the ability to carry any type of jug, bottle or jar by creating a hitch around the object and a carry handle. The carry handle can be made into a single loop as shown in the video above, or for heavier items can be made into two carry handles to split the load between two people.

When carrying heavier loads, the paracord shown can be replaced with a stronger natural fiber rope. What makes this knot truly versatile and one to remember, is its ability to be used in medical applications for traction or slings.

Ratings

Strength/Security/Stability/Difficulty

Each knot will be assigned a rating from 1-5 (1 representing the lowest score) based on the following four properties:

Strength – All knots will weaken the strength of  a rope, however, there are knots that are stronger than others. The scale here will reflect how strong the rope remains with the specified knot.

Security – The security scale refers to how well the knot will stay tied, and resist coming loose under a normal load.

Stability – Stability refers to how easily the knot will come untied under an abnormal load (i.e. the knot being pulled in a direction it was not intended to) A lower score here represents instability.

Difficulty – The lower the number, the easier a knot is to tie.

Posted in Hitches | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

All I Wanted Was a 10% Veteran Discount at Home Depot and Here’s What Happened

VA ID - ITS Tactical

While the title of this article sounds like I got screwed over as a Veteran at Home Depot, quite the opposite is true.

Today I’ll be walking through my adventures with the Veterans Administration when I attempted to obtain a VA ID so that I could get a 10% Veterans discount at Home Depot. Granted, my reasoning for obtaining one isn’t the most valid reason, but it’s honestly what finally got me into the VA to get one made.

It’s a fairly comical story and one I thought everyone might enjoy hearing. In this, I also hope my details will help fellow Veterans that might not be “in the system.” You’re going to hear that term quite a bit too, as it’s caused me to smack my head quite a few times in dealing with my local VA.

All I Wanted Was a Discount

When I heard that both Home Depot and Lowe’s offer a 10% discount to Veterans, I inquired to to find out more. My wife and I are homeowners and like many of you in the same boat, you probably have the same love/hate relationship with your local home improvement store that I do. On one hand, it’s exciting to look at all the eye candy there, envisioning what you can do to upgrade your home.

On the other hand, when something breaks, which it always does when you own your own home, you wind up at your local home improvement store covered in dirt and grime. You walk up and down multiple isles as fast as possible trying to find the repair part you need. Despite walking these same isles for 10 years, you still can’t find crap and wind up having to walk even more to track down a sales associate. Just me?

I digress, back to the ID situation. When inquiring with these home improvement stores about their discount, I obviously had to prove I was a Veteran to get the discount. Cool, so I’ll just finally get off my butt and go down to the VA and grab an ID. I’m in the system with the Texas VA and every few years they schedule appointments with me to verify my status.

Just to fill in a bit more on the backstory, I was medically separated from the Navy about 10 years ago due to my disability, which if you read my bio here on the ITS Crew page, it was the result of a diving accident while I was at BUD/s (Basic Underwater Demolition/SEAL training.) Anyhow, I went through TAPs (Transitional Assistance Program) during my out processing, where they go through all the Veterans benefits available to you after being separated.

There’s a dedicated section of the course that helps you register with the local VA office in your home state. This is done to ensure you have a local VA to go to for checkup appointments, etc. I mention all this to say again that I was in the system. I’ll save you the details during this spot in the article where I complain about getting a severance when they medically separated me and then had to pay it back with my disability benefits, which I didn’t receive in full until that repayment was satisfied.

VA Handbook

Apart from attending my regularly required appointments, I really never had a reason to visit the VA for medical care. My wife and I have always had our own insurance policy, but this recently changed due to the exorbitant costs of the so called “Affordable” Health Care Act. This being the case, I figured I’d go ahead and inquire about my options for VA healthcare while I was picking up my shiny new VA ID.

I’d received a booklet months back that went over all the VA benefits, including instructions on how to apply for a VA ID. This included a document to download, complete and bring down to your local VA when applying. I followed the instructions, filled out the form and finally got off my butt to drive over to the VA and grab an ID. Easy, right?

The Hallmark of Efficiency

Here’s the deal, nothing is ever easy with the VA. Efficient? Maybe, but never easy. There’s no way to make an appointment for an ID, you have to just walk in. I knew my day could potentially be derailed by my VA visit, but I didn’t know just how ridiculous it could be.

I stopped by the information desk and inquired about where I needed to go to apply for an ID, luckily it was within 10 yards of the information desk, so no big deal. I glanced at the waiting area and only saw three people sitting there. Relieved, I was handed an electronic number puck like you get at a restaurant. I thought to myself, “man, how efficient!” Maybe things were changing for the better at the VA. I quickly realized the puck had a label maker number on it and it was non-functioning. Regardless, I took a seat and hoped it would be a quick process.

Much to my dismay, out of the four available windows to help people at, there was only one with a VA employee sitting behind it. I hoped that with just three people in front of me, it wouldn’t take too long. I spied another employee with a clipboard speaking with two of the three people ahead of me and realized they were together. Great! Only two people were ahead of me now.

The woman with the clipboard moved over to the other gentleman sitting down waiting and I overheard her ask him for the number on the electronic puck. She copied it down on her clipboard with the reason for his visit and instead of moving over to take down my info, she went up to the window to speak with the lone employee behind it.

After 20 minutes of conversation between these two women and no one having been called up yet, I started to get impatient. The clipboard employee worked her way back over to the group of us, which had now grown to another three people that had come in after me. She stopped at one of these people and ran through her questions again with them. I assumed the order she was writing everyone down in had something to do with the order people would be called up in and I got even more impatient. I stood up and walked over to her to make sure my info made it onto the clipboard.

One ID Please

It took another 10 minutes for the woman behind the window to call up the first person in line and there’s no telling how long he’d already been there. After a grand total of 50 minutes since my arrival, I was finally called up.

I presented the paperwork to apply for my ID and I was asked if I was in the system. Yes, I said. I’ve been to a couple of appointments over the past few years, but it’s been awhile. After a quick scan of her computer monitor, she said that I wasn’t in the system. I let her know that there must be some mistake. I’d been out for around 10 years and know that I’m registered with the VA. I’ve had appointments and get regular mail from the VA.

“Well, that’s not the same as being in our system,” the employee told me. “We’ll have to get you added to our system here before you’ll be able to get an ID. Please fill out this form and we can get you entered.” I didn’t mention it before, but I’d done my due diligence and brought the two forms of ID required to apply for a VA ID and luckily, this is what she asked for next to add me into the system. However, she told me she also needed a copy of my DD-214 before she could finish entering me into the system.

So let me get this straight, I told her. Your local VA system you’re accessing there can’t tell you there’s a Veteran attached to the social security number I just provided you? No, she said. That’s why we need a copy of your DD-214. Deflated, I said that I’d have to bring that back in. She promptly handed me back all my paperwork and said, no problem, just bring this all back in with your DD-214 and we’ll get you added in then.

Lessons Learned:

  • Lesson 1: You’re not eligible for care at your local VA until you’re in their system.
  • Lesson 2: You need a copy of your DD-214 for your local VA, even if you’re already registered with the VA.

I left the VA, drove home, grabbed a copy of my DD-214, drove back, grabbed another non-functioning electronic number, took a seat and waited to be called up again. Now 3 hours into the process, including drive time, I visited the lone open window again. “Hi,” I said. “I was just here a bit ago and here’s my application to get added to the system, along with my DD-214 and two forms of ID.” “Sure,” she said. “Let me get all this entered for you.” I breathed a sigh of relief and was glad to finally be getting somewhere.

“Ok, I’ve got you added in,” she said. “When would you like to schedule your appointments?” Wait. Appointments? I just need an ID. I knew I wanted to inquire about healthcare at the VA, but one thing at a time, I came here for an ID. After fielding that question to the woman behind the window, she let me know that my entry into the system would take at least a week and that until that was complete, I wouldn’t be able to apply for an ID.

Great, considering this new information I went ahead and said that I’d like to go ahead and book the appointment she’d mentioned as long as I’d have to come back a third time. She quickly reminded me that it was two appointments. The first was blood work that would have to be done at least a week in advance of the next appointment, which was an initial visit with a primary care provider.

I went ahead and booked these two appointments and figured that I’d just finish my ID application after my blood work on that first appointment date. Multiple trips and hours later, I still didn’t have my VA ID. Cheer up buttercup, you’re almost in the system!

Lessons Learned:

  • Lesson 1: You’re not eligible for care at your local VA until you’re in their system.
  • Lesson 2: You need a copy of your DD-214 for your local VA, even if you’re already registered with the VA.
  • Lesson 3: Once your info is added to your local VA system, it takes a week for it to actually be in the system.
  • Lesson 4: Two appointments are required to make your addition to your local VA official. Blood work and a Primary Care Provider appointment.

Mail Call

A week later, I started to receive local VA paperwork in the mail concerning my upcoming appointments. A third appointment had now been added that I never scheduled. This was a patient information class that would apparently introduce me to my local VA. This was of course scheduled at an inconvenient time and would need to be changed. I looked through my paperwork and found a phone number for my local VA to call to change this date. After about 45 minutes of getting transferred and lost in phone queue hell, I abandoned my quest.

A day before my scheduled first appointment, which I never scheduled, I received an automated call from the VA reminding me of my appointment. Much to my dismay, this message didn’t include a way to cancel or reschedule, just the addition of needing to be responsible and cancel if needed, so that another Veteran could use that appointment slot. Needless to say I missed this appointment and despite trying to call back yet again, I wasn’t able to figure out how to reschedule.

VA Blood Test

When my first actual scheduled appointment approached, I read over the instruction on my reminder, which said, “you have been scheduled for pre-appointment testing. If you are scheduled for fasting labs, nothing to eat or drink for at least 8 hours prior to these tests.” No one said anything about fasting labs, so do I fast? The day before my appointment I received a nice call from a VA employee reminding me of said appointment. I have to say, it was nice to actually receive a call from a human being, instead of the automated message. I asked the man on the phone if I was required to fast before my blood work and he apologized, saying that he’s just told who to remind about what appointment and didn’t have any details for me.

I decided to fast anyway, just in case. Considering how everything else had gone up until now, I didn’t need to get to my blood work appointment and find out it couldn’t be done because I hadn’t fasted. When I finally arrived for my appointment, I passed the area where I’d be going after this to finish my VA ID application and noticed that there was more than one person working behind the windows today. Awesome.

Upon entering the area to get my blood work done, I approached the desk and showed the VA employee my appointment paperwork. He then asked if I had a VA ID, which he’d need to check me in. “No,” I said. “I don’t have one yet.” “You really need to get that taken care of,” he said as he handed me a slip of paper to write my name and social security number on. I’m still baffled that after all these years and rampant identity theft, the military (and subsequently the VA) still uses social security numbers. My paper was clipped to a plastic number and I was told to have a seat. I wondered where that piece of paper would wind up and hoped it would be a shredder.

Waiting Room

Nestled amongst a sea of Veterans that had to number at least 50, I sighed at the long wait I knew was ahead of me. Surprisingly, the wait was only 10 minutes, which impressed the hell out of me. I walked back to the nurse who was drawing blood and asked if I had needed to fast for this. She said “yes, fasting is always required before blood work.” I mentioned that that was never clear to me, but I’d done it anyway. After an acknowledgement that I’d chosen wisely, she pierced my skin to start the blood flow.

After the harvesting, my arm bandaged with way too much coban for one man and I was handed a urine test jar. “Ok, just head down the hall to the bathroom and bring this back to me when you’re done.” This was news to me, I certainly didn’t ever get the notice that I should be ready to take a leak when I got here. This was apparently by design to be a surprise drug test too, I gathered. I purposely hadn’t drank any liquids since going to sleep the evening before to comply with the fasting instructions and hoped I could perform under pressure.

She attached that slip of paper I’d reluctantly written my social security number on to the test jar and asked, “do you have a VA ID?” After she saw the look on my face and my head shaking, she said, “you should really get that done, it will make things much easier around here.”

I was presented with two unisex bathroom doors to choose from and checked the handle on the one I approached to see if it was unlocked. I entered to find a fellow Veteran give me a scowl as he grumbled that he was in there. Geez, I thought to myself, lock the door man. The other bathroom was unoccupied and and I closed the door and reached for the lock, I found that there wasn’t one. Great, not only do I have to hope I can pee in a cup, but I have to do it with the possibility of someone barging in on me like I’d just done to the other guy.

Luckily, for some crazy reason, I had no issues filling the cup. After practicing good hygiene, I brought my cup back to the nurse and was told I was good to go. As I passed the lobby on my way out, I realized why I’d been seen so quickly, despite the crowd of Veterans that had clearly been there before me. I noticed many of them with cups in their hands, obviously sitting there waiting on that magic urge to pee. Phew, that could have been me.

Smile!

Feeling great for being able to control my bladder, I strode back over to ID desk and silently cheered on the inside when I saw no one waiting. I approached the window and let the gentleman behind it know that I’d like to get an ID made. He stopped me mid-sentence and said that I’d have to go get a number from the information desk. I did the “glance back” body language motion letting him know that it seemed a bit ridiculous, considering I was the only one there. He non-verbally let me know that he didn’t care and I walked over to grab a number staring at the top of my eyelids.

Non-functioning electronic number in hand, I reapproached the window and handed it off. “What can I help you with?” I’d like to get an ID made, I said. “Here’s my paperwork and my two forms of ID.” One was my driver’s license and the other was my voter’s registration card, which according to the worksheet listing forms of ID to bring, was as an acceptable form of secondary ID.

After looking over my paperwork and getting help with how to enter the correct number from my voter registration card into the system, the man helping me said. “That’s it, let’s just take your photo and you should get your ID card in the mail within two weeks.” This was it, I thought. I was done. When the flash went off on the camera, I distinctly remember trying to smile, but what came out was clearly an expression that tells the story of my experience.

VA ID

As I write this, I’ve just returned from my second scheduled appointment with the primary care physician and of course, it was a real doozy. First, let’s recap again.

Lessons Learned:

  • Lesson 1: You’re not eligible for care at your local VA until you’re in their system.
  • Lesson 2: You need a copy of your DD-214 for your local VA, even if you’re already registered with the VA.
  • Lesson 3: Once your info is added to your local VA system, it takes a week for it to actually be in the system.
  • Lesson 4: Two appointments are required to make your addition to your local VA official. Blood work and a Primary Care Provider appointment.
  • Lesson 5: Always assume you need to fast before your blood work, even if it’s not clear.
  • Lesson 6: Despite not being able to drink any liquids for 8 hours before your blood work, you’ll still need to be able to pee in a cup.
  • Lesson 7: Don’t forget your two forms of ID when you go back to get your VA ID made.
  • Lesson 8: Smile for the camera.

Primary Care Physician

My local VA has extremely efficient appointment check-in machines staged throughout the center, which I can now use, thanks to my shiny new VA ID that arrived in record time. Seriously, I was impressed. It took less than a week to get it.

After a quick check-in, confirming my details and walking over to the clinic where I’d be seen, I was already being called back. How about that! I met with a nurse first who took my vitals (blood pressure, temperature and also oxygen saturation using a pulse oximeter.)

A few questions later, many which I assumed tested for depression, PTSD and some other things, I was ushered over to my primary care physician. He was awesome and we had a lot in common to talk about. We went over my blood work and talked about my overall health, etc. In all it equated to a check-up in my mind and went extremely well.

I inquired with him about what I needed to do to set up future appointments and he said that he’d go ahead and schedule something for me in about 9 months, but the typical procedure was to make an appointment with the nurse of your primary care provider. So my question was of course, can I get the number to your nurse so I have it? “Oh,” he said. “I probably won’t be your primary care provider, but I could be, that’s assigned to you within about two weeks.” That makes complete sense, right. Rather than actually meet with who would be my primary care provider, the VA randomly assigns these appointments to whoever they can. Apparently there’s also no way to request a specific PCP, at least at my local VA. Bummer, I liked this guy.

The doctor also mentioned that if I should ever go to the hospital, I need to tell them immediately that I’m a Veteran and the center I’m “in the system” at. The hospital will then stabilize me if it’s life threatening and contact the VA to transfer me. He said that the local VA hospitals are often so full that they’ll authorize care where you’re at, but if you don’t mention the VA, you’re liable for your bills once they start working on you. Makes me want to hang a VA dog tag around my neck, just in case I can’t talk when I’m brought in. Seriously.

Back to that appointment in 9 months. I asked if that was necessary, considering I’m in good health. I didn’t feel like it was right to eat up an appointment slot, just because. I remembered the phone message telling me not to waste an appointment and to remember the others potentially waiting for my spot.

The doctor said that if you’re not seen every two years at your local VA, they’ll delete you from the system and you’d have to go through everything I’d just gone through with blood work and a PCP appointment all over again.

Wait, so the VA, who is known to be so busy that Veterans have to wait months to get seen, is telling me that I need to make sure I come in every two years, just to make sure I retain my status as a patient? That seems a little counterintuitive and extremely inefficient.

My appointment was fairly uneventful after that point, but I was still in disbelief about the whole two-year thing.

Lessons Learned:

  • Lesson 1: You’re not eligible for care at your local VA until you’re in their system.
  • Lesson 2: You need a copy of your DD-214 for your local VA, even if you’re already registered with the VA.
  • Lesson 3: Once your info is added to your local VA system, it takes a week for it to actually be in the system.
  • Lesson 4: Two appointments are required to make your addition to your local VA official. Blood work and a Primary Care Provider appointment.
  • Lesson 5: Always assume you need to fast before your blood work, even if it’s not clear.
  • Lesson 6: Despite not being able to drink any liquids for 8 hours before your blood work, you’ll still need to be able to pee in a cup.
  • Lesson 7: Don’t forget your two forms of ID when you go back to get your VA ID made.
  • Lesson 8: Smile for the camera.
  • Lesson 9: You may think your initial primary care provider appointment is with your primary care provider, but it’s not. They’ll pick that for you later.
  • Lesson 10: Always tell a hospital you might wind up at that you’re a Veteran and which center you’re “in the system” at. If you don’t, you’ll be footing the bill.
  • Lesson 11: You have to get seen at your local VA center once every two years to maintain your status there, or risk going through the whole process all over again.

Takeaway

VA Medical Center

I’d like to preface this section with one thing, the VA is indeed efficient in many areas. They’ll efficiently tell you to come back with your DD-214 and efficiently remind you that you need to get your ID made, but efficiency and speed are inversely proportionate at the VA. They also need help with their communication when it comes to written instructions, but I digress.

You may think that because of my documented experiences with the VA that I’m bitter or just a dick. I may be both, but I believe it or not I really like the VA. I love all they do for Veterans and no one is perfect, especially me. There’s things they need to work on, but overall I respect those that work for the VA and very much appreciate what I perceive to be a different level of care from the doctors there.

What I mean is that in the private sector, doctors seem to be bought off by drug companies and care more for their bottom line than for the care of their patients. Now these are only my opinions, as they’ve been in many areas of this article, but my experience with VA doctors has always been that they don’t operate like civilian doctors. They don’t appear to push the latest and greatest medication from the highest bidder, or measure their success at how quickly they can jump from one patient to the next.

I could be wrong, but that’s my perception from seeing what I have of VA doctors and those that work for the VA system. It’s an epidemic these days that medication seems to be the answer to everything. Drug companies have invaded every form of media available, telling you why you should remember their name and request their product if you exhibit the signs and symptoms. Nevermind those pesky side effects like anal leakage.

It’s damn near self medicating. People hear all about a new drug and think, “yeah, I need that.” I personally can’t stand those commercials and think they do more harm than good.

Overall, I’m thrilled that I’m in “the system” and now know that I’ll need to keep up what could be useless appointments every two years to retain my status. At least my VA ID is good until 2026 and provided I stay in the system, I won’t have to mess with the process again until I’m 47 and it’s time to renew it. I can’t wait to learn all about how to do that.

I’ll add one more lesson learned, just to bring the list to 12. I’m sure many of you out there have VA stories, both positive and negative. If you have the time, leave them in the comments. Hopefully they’ll help others, like I hope my story has.

Lessons Learned:

  • Lesson 1: You’re not eligible for care at your local VA until you’re in their system.
  • Lesson 2: You need a copy of your DD-214 for your local VA, even if you’re already registered with the VA.
  • Lesson 3: Once your info is added to your local VA system, it takes a week for it to actually be in the system.
  • Lesson 4: Two appointments are required to make your addition to your local VA official. Blood work and a Primary Care Provider appointment.
  • Lesson 5: Always assume you need to fast before your blood work, even if it’s not clear.
  • Lesson 6: Despite not being able to drink any liquids for 8 hours before your blood work, you’ll still need to be able to pee in a cup.
  • Lesson 7: Don’t forget your two forms of ID when you go back to get your VA ID made.
  • Lesson 8: Smile for the camera.
  • Lesson 9: You may think your initial primary care provider appointment is with your primary care provider, but it’s not. They’ll pick that for you later.
  • Lesson 10: Always tell a hospital you might wind up at that you’re a Veteran and which center you’re “in the system” at. If you don’t, you’ll be footing the bill.
  • Lesson 11: You have to get seen at your local VA center once every two years to maintain your status there, or risk going through the whole process all over again.
  • Lesson 12: Efficiency and speed are inversely proportionate at the VA.
Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , | 86 Comments